← Search

James McArdle

Austin, TX
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
56 matches · 16W–40L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add James McArdle to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history56 matches
L
2026-06-28 · Courtyard Dawgs · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-21 · Courtyard Dawgs · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Aaron Flores
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-06-14 · Courtyard Dawgs · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Allen Rubin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-14 · Love Means Nothing · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Joan Kincaid mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 3-3
L
2026-06-07 · Courtyard Dawgs · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Thomas Brighton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-05-31 · Courtyard Dawgs · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Aaron Flores
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-05-31 · Love Means Nothing · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Joan Kincaid mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-03 · Courtyard Dawgs · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Aaron Flores
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-04-26 · Courtyard Dawgs · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mason Gross
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
W
2026-04-19 · Courtyard Dawgs · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Thomas Brighton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-03-29 · Courtyard Dawgs · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Emory Clark
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-03-29 · Love Means Nothing · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kristen Gilson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams10 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
36.4%
12W–21L · 44.1% of games
3.5
20%
2W–8L · 35.3% of games
6.0mixed
20%
2W–8L · 44.6% of games
7.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 41% of the time
#3 Doubles
41%
23 matches
#2 Doubles
34%
19 matches
#1 Doubles
18%
10 matches
#1 Singles
5%
3 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert