← Search

Carolyn Goff

Laupahoehoe, HI
3.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
80 matches · 35W–45L · seasons 2020–2024

Captains: add Carolyn Goff to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history80 matches
L
2024-04-28 · Tita's Too · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Amy Brotzman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2024-04-14 · Tita's Too · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Reiko Hamano
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
L
2024-03-13 · Tita Too · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ai Chir Magliulo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2024-02-25 · Tita Too · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tomoko Fuselier
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2024-01-28 · Tita Too · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rebecca Daniel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2024-01-21 · Tita Too · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Frances Calantoc
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2023-08-27 · Classic Hits · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Robynn Ross
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2023-08-20 · Classic Hits · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kim Ek
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2023-08-06 · Classic Hits · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Matilde Narido
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-3, 0-1
W
2023-07-30 · Classic Hits · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kim Ek
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2023-07-22 · Classic Hits · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kim Ek
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 5-7, 1-0
W
2023-07-16 · Classic Hits · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kim Ek
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams18 teams · 2020–2024
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
44.4%
4W–5L · 51.5% of games
4.0
18.2%
2W–9L · 34.7% of games
6.5
85.7%
6W–1L · 57.8% of games
7.0
52.5%
21W–19L · 54.4% of games
8.0
18.2%
2W–9L · 37.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 49% of the time
#1 Doubles
49%
39 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
24 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
17 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova