← Search

Christopher Tunnell

Ashland, OH
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
68 matches · 34W–34L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Christopher Tunnell to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history68 matches
W
2026-07-09 · A18 4.0M 1 AS Smith · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
Thomas Major
2026-07-07 · A40 4.0M NC Otto · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-0, 1-0
W
2026-07-02 · A18 4.0M 1 AS Smith · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
L
2026-07-01 · A18 4.0M 1 AS Smith · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-30 · A40 4.0M NC Otto · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-06-29 · A40 4.5M NR Horwich · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jason Self
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
W
2026-06-23 · A40 4.0M NC Otto · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-06-22 · A40 4.5M NR Horwich · #4 Doubles · 4.5 · with Matthew Horwich
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-18 · A18 4.0M 1 AS Smith · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-06-16 · A40 4.0M NC Otto · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-06-15 · A40 4.5M NR Horwich · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Barry Hubbard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-05 · X18 9.0 AS Slomski · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Haylee Fearon mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams18 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
60%
3W–2L · 53.6% of games
4.0
95%
19W–1L · 68.6% of games
4.5
20.8%
5W–19L · 39.8% of games
8.5
35.3%
6W–11L · 46.4% of games
9.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 32% of the time
#2 Doubles
32%
22 matches
#1 Singles
31%
21 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
19 matches
#1 Doubles
6%
4 matches
#2 Singles
2%
1 match
#4 Doubles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal