← Search

Jim Ruxer

Indianapolis, IN
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
86 matches · 53W–33L · seasons 2019–2025

Captains: add Jim Ruxer to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history86 matches
L
2025-03-30 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Timothy Fuller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-1, 0-1
W
David Harmon / Duane Lay
2025-03-22 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Dan Beaty
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2025-02-06 · CIN A18 3.5M IRCD Singh · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jared Ruxer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2025-01-23 · CIN A18 3.5M IRCD Singh · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jared Ruxer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
Robert Johnson / Anthony Annee
2024-11-06 · CIN A40 3.5M IRCD Singh · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Neal Burnett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
Jared Houser / Gary Breslauer
2024-07-17 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cliff Dickinson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
Gene Snodgrass / Kristopher Cook
2024-07-11 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Dan Beaty
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2024-06-19 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dan Beaty
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
Kyle Grayson / Darcy Schmidt
2024-06-13 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Timothy Fuller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L
2024-06-05 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dan Beaty
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2024-05-22 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Neal Burnett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
Joe Lustig / Stephen Berggren
2024-04-14 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Daniel Neufelder
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams3 teams · 2024–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
63.8%
30W–17L · 55.2% of games
7.0
70%
14W–6L · 59.1% of games
8.0
28.6%
2W–5L · 36.3% of games
7.0mixed
85.7%
6W–1L · 61% of games
8.0mixed
20%
1W–4L · 44.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 47% of the time
#1 Doubles
47%
40 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
26 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
18 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams