← Search

Jon Cram

Littleton, CO
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
120 matches · 55W–65L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jon Cram to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history120 matches
W
2026-09-01 · KC-RH GREEN · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joseph Rachwalski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
W
2026-08-25 · KC-RH GREEN · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with David Frederick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-18 · KC-RH GREEN · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ron Dart
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-11 · KC-RH GREEN · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jason Hand
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-28 · KC-RH GREEN · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Randy Lazzell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-21 · KC-RH GREEN · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Randy Lazzell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-07-14 · KC-CC BLUE · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Randy Lazzell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-16 · KC-CC BLUE · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jason Hand
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-11 · GR NAVY · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Robert Sanders
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-06-09 · KC-CC BLUE · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with John Tiernan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-04 · GR NAVY · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Brett Linscott
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-06-02 · KC-CC BLUE · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jason Hand
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-2, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams26 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
57.8%
37W–27L · 50.4% of games
4.0
9.1%
2W–20L · 33.8% of games
7.0
55.6%
10W–8L · 51.1% of games
8.0
37.5%
6W–10L · 46.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 47% of the time
#1 Doubles
47%
56 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
39 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
24 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal