← Search

Thomas Hack

— year-end
30 matches · 10W–20L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Thomas Hack to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history30 matches
L
2026-06-29 · San Jose - Cumbow · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Johnthomas Cumbow
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-27 · San Jose - Cumbow · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Johnthomas Cumbow
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-13 · San Jose - Cumbow · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael Zambetti
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-7
L
2026-06-06 · San Jose - Cumbow · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael Zambetti
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
Bob Peaslee / Michael O'Rourke
2026-05-16 · San Jose - Cumbow · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Abe Dopazo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-09 · San Jose - Cumbow · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with William Langley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-03-07 · San Jose - Cumbow · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Derek Kettel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-03-06 · San Jose - Hedrick · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cynthia Hack mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 6-7
W
John Williams / JD Reeder
2026-02-28 · San Jose - Cumbow · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Chris Oliver
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
L
2026-02-20 · San Jose - Hedrick · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cynthia Hack mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 5-7
L
2026-02-07 · San Jose - Cumbow · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with William Langley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-01-30 · San Jose - Hedrick · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cynthia Hack mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 0-1
Teams29 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
20%
2W–8L · 37.5% of games
4.0
100%
5W–0L · 60% of games
7.0
50%
2W–2L · 46.1% of games
8.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
9.0
0%
0W–5L · 27.2% of games
7.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 37% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 43% of the time
#3 Doubles
43%
13 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
10 matches
#1 Doubles
17%
5 matches
#4 Doubles
7%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova