← Search

Gayle Weaks

Decatur, GA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
28 matches · 14W–14L · seasons 2025–2027

Captains: add Gayle Weaks to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history28 matches
W
2026-07-21 · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Erica Weaver
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-07-12 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Chequetta Allen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 0-6, 6-2
W
2026-07-07 · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Erica Weaver
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-06-23 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Erica Weaver
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-06-21 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Avionne Fortner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 6-2
L
2026-06-14 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sharon Douglas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-02-12 · Sugar Creek (Janelle Blasingame)* · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Angela Engram
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5, 5-7
W
Janet King / Mindy Barber
2026-01-28 · Sugar Creek (Janelle Blasingame)* · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cathy Hampton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-01-21 · Sugar Creek (Janelle Blasingame)* · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Erica Weaver
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-01-14 · Sugar Creek (Ramani Damera)* · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Angela Finney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
W
2026-01-13 · Sugar Creek (Thelma Smith)* · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kim J King
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-6
L
2025-12-13 · Sugar Creek (Thelma Smith)* · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Alaina Warfield
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams8 teams · 2025–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.0
63.2%
12W–7L · 54.6% of games
3.5
22.2%
2W–7L · 32% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 50% of the time
#3 Doubles
50%
14 matches
#4 Doubles
25%
7 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
6 matches
#1 Doubles
4%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova