← Search

Sue Edmonds

Vancouver, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
117 matches · 47W–70L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Sue Edmonds to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history117 matches
W
2026-04-23 · NOR-VTC-Olson · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sandra Seyler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-04-23 · NOR-VTC-Olson · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lauren Holloway
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-0, 1-0
W
2026-04-16 · NOR-VTC-Olson · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sandra Seyler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-04-02 · NOR-VTC-Olson · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lynn Wagner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-01-18 · VTC-Nadig · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Karen Walker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-01-03 · VTC-Nadig · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tuni Stecker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2025-10-25 · VTC-Mills · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Patti Dybdahl
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2025-10-11 · VTC-Mills · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Patti Dybdahl
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2025-09-27 · VTC-Mills · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jenny Pizot
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 0-6
W
2025-09-14 · VTC-Mills · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Janet Mills
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
W
2025-05-01 · N OR-VTC-Olson · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Louanne Fuller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2025-04-24 · N OR-VTC-Olson · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sandra Seyler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 5-7, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams21 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
83.3%
5W–1L · 61% of games
4.0
14.3%
5W–30L · 36.3% of games
7.0
72.4%
21W–8L · 62.3% of games
8.0
31.7%
13W–28L · 40.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 48% of the time
#1 Doubles
48%
56 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
35 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
26 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams