← Search

Chip Pew

EVERGREEN, CO
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
142 matches · 84W–58L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Chip Pew to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history142 matches
W
2026-07-09 · MC GOLD · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Markus Funk
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-07-02 · MC GOLD · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Shane Carroll
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-06-25 · MC GOLD · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with David Gerbosi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
L
2026-06-04 · MC GOLD · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with David Gerbosi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-28 · PH RED · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Matthew Picklo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-21 · PH RED · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Ben Huber
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-05-07 · PH RED · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kevin Hahn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-04-30 · PH RED · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Zack Telljohann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-04-23 · PH RED · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Daniel Dominic
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-6, 1-0
L
2025-05-29 · PH RED · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with David Gerbosi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
L
2025-05-22 · PH RED · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with David Gerbosi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2025-05-15 · PH RED · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with David Gerbosi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 1-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams17 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
4.0
80%
4W–1L · 73% of games
4.5
59.3%
32W–22L · 54% of games
5.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0
67.6%
23W–11L · 55.8% of games
8.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
9.0
42.9%
3W–4L · 44% of games
7.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 62.7% of games
8.0mixed
80%
4W–1L · 58.9% of games
9.0mixed
58.8%
10W–7L · 60% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 34% of the time
#2 Doubles
34%
48 matches
#3 Doubles
34%
48 matches
#1 Doubles
32%
46 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer