← Search

Jennifer Linn Howard

Tulsa, OK
5.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
123 matches · 86W–37L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jennifer Linn Howard to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history123 matches
L
2026-06-28 · Bayer/LF 9.0 40sX · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Gregory Kopervos mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-26 · Tulsa/Howard/18&over9.0X · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Gregory Kopervos mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-3
L
2026-06-20 · Bayer/LF 9.0 40sX · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Gregory Kopervos mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-16 · Howard/LF HIGH TRI · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lina Wollmershauser
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-13 · Bayer/LF 9.0 40sX · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Thomas Arens mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-7
L
2026-06-10 · Howard/LF HIGH TRI · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lina Wollmershauser
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-07 · Tulsa/Howard/18&over9.0X · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Gregory Kopervos mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 4-6
L
2026-05-28 · Bayer/LF 9.0 40sX · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Thomas Arens mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-04-04 · Howard/LF HIGH TRI · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lina Wollmershauser
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-7
L
2026-03-23 · Howard/LF HIGH TRI · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lina Wollmershauser
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-09 · Howard/LF HIGH TRI · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lina Wollmershauser
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
W
2025-11-05 · OK/Howard/40&OVER4.5W · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Suzanne Peterson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams31 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.5
85.7%
6W–1L · 61.2% of games
4.0
0%
0W–9L · 25% of games
4.5
92.7%
38W–3L · 69.8% of games
5.0
50%
2W–2L · 56.2% of games
5.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 48.1% of games
8.0mixed
83.3%
5W–1L · 64.3% of games
9.0mixed
59.6%
28W–19L · 52.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 55% of the time
#1 Doubles
55%
68 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
30 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
21 matches
#1 Singles
2%
2 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert