← Search

Matthew Dannemiller

Seattle, WA
4.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
127 matches · 106W–21L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Matthew Dannemiller to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history127 matches
W
2026-02-21 · NTC-Fogt · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Todd Raymond
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-01-25 · NTC-Fogt · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Todd Raymond
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2025-01-19 · NTC-Fogt · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Todd Raymond
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
W
2025-01-04 · NTC-Fogt · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Aaron Coe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-5, 1-0
W
2024-04-21 · TCSP-Hartvigson · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Todd Raymond
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
L
2024-04-14 · TCSP-Hartvigson · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Todd Raymond
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
L
2024-04-06 · TCSP-Hartvigson · #2 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2024-03-24 · #3 Doubles · with Todd Raymond championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-2, 0-1
W
2024-03-22 · #2 Doubles · with Todd Raymond championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2024-02-09 · TCSP-Hartvigson · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Todd Raymond
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2024-02-04 · TCSP-Hartvigson · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Grant Hartvigson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 0-1
W
2024-01-26 · TCSP-Hartvigson · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Todd Raymond
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams17 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
94.7%
18W–1L · 76.8% of games
4.0
87.5%
28W–4L · 72.3% of games
4.5
70.4%
19W–8L · 59.3% of games
7.0mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
88.9%
8W–1L · 62.7% of games
9.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 50% of the time
#1 Doubles
50%
63 matches
#1 Singles
18%
23 matches
#2 Doubles
17%
21 matches
#2 Singles
9%
12 matches
#3 Doubles
5%
6 matches
#1 Male Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams