← Search

Scott Hartfelder

— year-end
220 matches · 128W–92L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Scott Hartfelder to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history220 matches
L
2026-08-16 · Over the Hill Gang - Martinez/IS · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Barb Evans mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-02 · Over the Hill Gang - Martinez/IS · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Barb Evans mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-12 · Over the Hill Gang - Martinez/IS · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Barb Evans mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-05-16 · Acree/Lf 55s8.0M · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Bret McGuire
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
L
2026-04-12 · Leeks/IS 40s 7.0X · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jennifer Hartfelder mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-03-28 · Acree/Lf 55s8.0M · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ronald Gordon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-6
L
2026-03-13 · Leeks/IS 40s 7.0X · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Carla Kimbrough mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-03-11 · Martinez/4.0M/IS · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michael Pearson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
L
2026-03-07 · Acree/Lf 55s8.0M · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Steve Flowers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-03-05 · Martinez/4.0M/IS · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with John Holcomb
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-02-27 · Leeks/IS 40s 7.0X · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jennifer Hartfelder mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 2-6
L
2026-02-24 · Martinez/4.0M/IS · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with DAVID GORDON
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-2, 1-0
Teams40 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
3.5
81%
17W–4L · 59.4% of games
4.0
50%
19W–19L · 52.1% of games
7.0
70.6%
24W–10L · 58.5% of games
8.0
52.2%
24W–22L · 51.3% of games
5.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
50%
6W–6L · 55.6% of games
7.0mixed
65%
26W–14L · 53% of games
8.0mixed
44%
11W–14L · 48.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 35% of the time
#1 Doubles
35%
76 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
64 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
59 matches
#1 Singles
5%
10 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
6 matches
#2 Singles
2%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams