← Search

Harrison Campbell

Montgomery, AL
4.0A year-end 2025
i
Appeal — granted on request, not computed
65 matches · 56W–9L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Harrison Campbell to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history65 matches
W
2026-08-18 · MCC Long · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Bobby Trott
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-08-03 · MCC Long · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Todd Henderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
John O'Brien / Carlos Reyes
2026-06-29 · O'Connor Campbell · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Mariano Runco
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-06-24 · O'Connor Campbell · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Mark Caradori
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-04-29 · MG Campbell · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stephen Nettelhorst
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
W
2026-04-27 · MG Campbell · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stephen Nettelhorst
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-04-22 · MG Campbell · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mark Barron
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-04-20 · MG Campbell · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Brian Cone
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-02-24 · MG Loe/Torbert · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brian Cone
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-02-10 · MG Loe/Torbert · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mark Caradori
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2025-11-05 · MG - Campbell · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2025-10-29 · MG - Campbell · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams20 teams · 2024–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.0
87.5%
42W–6L · 62.4% of games
4.5
80%
4W–1L · 69% of games
7.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.5
100%
6W–0L · 67% of games
9.5
50%
2W–2L · 50% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 51% of the time
#1 Doubles
51%
33 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
15 matches
#1 Singles
19%
12 matches
#3 Doubles
5%
3 matches
#2 Singles
3%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova