← Search

Sarah Hansel

— year-end
11 matches · 8W–3L · seasons 2019–2023

Captains: add Sarah Hansel to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history11 matches
L
2023-01-12 · K:KeeneFlashes:Nordstrom:Waller · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Anne Nordstrom
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2022-12-01 · K:KeeneFlashes:Nordstrom:Waller · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jennifer Hanrahan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
W
2022-11-17 · K:KeeneFlashes:Nordstrom:Waller · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lorna Harling
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2020-03-12 · KRC:Nordstrom/Waller · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sarah Bulger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
Lauriann Smerald / Nancy Jachim
2020-01-30 · KRC:Nordstrom/Waller · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sarah Bulger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2020-01-23 · KRC:Nordstrom/Waller · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sarah Bulger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
Lynn Friedel / Sarah Patton
2019-12-05 · KRC:Nordstrom/Waller · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Rosemary Gianno
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W
Patricia Waldvogel / Beth Moore
2019-11-21 · KRC:Nordstrom/Waller · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sarah Bulger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
Shelby Blunt / Kathy Noordsij
2019-04-18 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Susan Doyle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2019-03-07 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Janet Cohen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
W
Nancy Jachim / Lisa Andrews
2018-11-15 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sarah Bulger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
Teams2 teams · 2020–2023
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 levels played
7.0
72.7%
8W–3L · 56.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 73% of the time
#1 Doubles
73%
8 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer