← Search

Cecil Eager

New Braunfels, TX
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
38 matches · 32W–6L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Cecil Eager to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history38 matches
W
2026-09-02 · Blossom Mixto · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Susan Danielson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 7-5
L
2026-08-29 · Blossom Mixto · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Susan Danielson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-08-15 · Blossom Mixto · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Susan Danielson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-06-17 · Newks Ace's · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chol Chong
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W
Michael Spadoni / Mark Brown
2026-05-31 · AHLXV+ · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Dennis Reblin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-17 · Newks Ace's · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Troy Bolton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-0
W
2026-05-09 · Newks Ace's · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Austin Weeks
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-05-08 · AHLXV+ · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with R Flint Bourgeois
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-03 · AHLXV+ · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Gary Jenkins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-05-02 · Newks Ace's · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jonathan McCauley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
Mark Brown / Mark Gitter
2026-04-26 · AHLXV+ · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Brad Nabers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
W
2026-04-25 · Newks Ace's · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Troy Bolton II
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams31 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
100%
13W–0L · 62.7% of games
8.0
73.7%
14W–5L · 62.7% of games
9.0
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 42% of the time
#1 Doubles
42%
16 matches
#3 Doubles
34%
13 matches
#2 Doubles
18%
7 matches
#1 Singles
3%
1 match
#4 Doubles
3%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal