← Search

Mary Wheat

— year-end
93 matches · 25W–68L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Mary Wheat to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history93 matches
L
2025-11-05 · BC Bring It · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Danielle Sackett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2025-10-01 · BC Bring It · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sue Oxley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2025-09-24 · BC Bring It · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sue Oxley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2025-09-17 · BC Bring It · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sue Oxley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3
W
2025-09-11 · Park City MARC-Greenhalgh/Brooks · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Teresa Polistina
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
2025-09-04 · Park City MARC-Greenhalgh/Brooks · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Teresa Polistina
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
L
2025-08-28 · Park City MARC-Greenhalgh/Brooks · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michelle Doggett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2025-08-07 · Park City MARC-Greenhalgh/Brooks · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Teresa Polistina
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2025-07-31 · Park City MARC-Greenhalgh/Brooks · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Teresa Polistina
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2025-07-17 · Park City MARC-Greenhalgh/Brooks · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Faith Petersen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
L
2025-05-21 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sue Oxley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 0-6, 0-1
L
2025-04-23 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Alexis Schutzer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
Teams21 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
4.0
26.4%
23W–64L · 41.4% of games
8.0
33.3%
2W–4L · 46.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 41% of the time
#3 Doubles
41%
38 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
31 matches
#1 Doubles
14%
13 matches
#4 Doubles
10%
9 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal