Paul Ackermann
172 matches · 74W–98L · seasons 2019–2026
Captains: add Paul Ackermann to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.
Match history172 matches
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 5-7, 1-0
Teams46 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
30%
6W–14L · 44.6% of games
3.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.0
54.7%
47W–39L · 50.9% of games
4.5
19%
4W–17L · 38.5% of games
7.0mixed
22.2%
2W–7L · 39.2% of games
8.0mixed
41.2%
14W–20L · 43.6% of games
9.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #2 Doubles, 41% of the time
#2 Doubles
41%
70 matches
#1 Doubles
35%
60 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
41 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.