← Search

Mike Jones

— year-end
180 matches · 118W–62L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Mike Jones to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history180 matches
L
2026-07-22 · Henneman 2026 65+ · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Edwin Freeman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-07-08 · 65+ 9.0 Acc. Team · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Craig Ballentine
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6
L
2026-07-08 · 65+ 9.0 Acc. Team · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Edwin Freeman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6
W
2026-06-24 · Henneman 2026 65+ · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Edwin Freeman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
W
2026-05-20 · Henneman 2026 65+ · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Craig Ballentine
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-03-21 · Lopez James · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Blake Gall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-03-05 · Lopez James · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michael James
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
David Schlosser / James Werst
2026-02-14 · #2 Doubles · with Edwin Freeman championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
Terry Hazell / George Padgett
2026-02-14 · #1 Doubles · with Edwin Freeman championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 0-1
L
Robert Franklin / Ronnie Acebo
2026-02-13 · #2 Doubles · with Edwin Freeman championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-01-22 · Lopez James · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michael James
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2025-12-01 · Peschel ES2026 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Edwin Freeman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 5-7, 0-1
Teams29 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.0
78.7%
37W–10L · 60.8% of games
7.0
66.7%
4W–2L · 48.6% of games
8.0
65%
67W–36L · 56.3% of games
9.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
80%
4W–1L · 60% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 48% of the time
#3 Doubles
48%
87 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
57 matches
#1 Doubles
19%
34 matches
#2 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is mostly mental. You win or lose the match before you even go out there.
Venus Williams