← Search

Katherine Gibbs

Eugene, OR
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
202 matches · 129W–73L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Katherine Gibbs to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history202 matches
L
2026-09-12 · TTC-Tanselli/Hamilton · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Dianne Tanselli
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-12 · SOR-STSC-Reid · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Gloria Flager
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-06-13 · SOR-STSC-Reid · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lisa Reid
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-06-07 · EYMCA-Ablow · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Janine Bryant
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-06-06 · EYMCA-Ablow · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jill Schoner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
W
2026-05-30 · EYMCA-Ablow · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cynthia Gupta
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-05-09 · SOR-STSC-Reid · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Gloria Flager
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-05-03 · #1 Doubles · with Mee Wai Lam championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-05-03 · #1 Doubles · with Mee Wai Lam championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
W
2026-05-02 · SOR-EYMCA-Bryant · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mee Wai Lam
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-05-01 · SOR-EYMCA-Bryant · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Leah Gibbs
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-05-01 · SOR-EYMCA-Bryant · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Leah Gibbs
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams32 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
65.5%
38W–20L · 55.5% of games
4.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0
73.1%
57W–21L · 58.6% of games
8.0
41.2%
7W–10L · 45.2% of games
7.0mixed
60%
6W–4L · 48.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 50% of the time
#1 Doubles
50%
101 matches
#2 Doubles
37%
74 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
27 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova