← Search

Augusta Smith

Natchez, MS
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
16 matches · 10W–6L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Augusta Smith to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history16 matches
W
2026-08-22 · Natchez-Hogue · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sally Jones
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-08-06 · Natchez-Hogue · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary Ruth Caldwell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-03-24 · Natchez · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Margaret Fudickar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
W
2025-10-05 · Natchez · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Margaret Fudickar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2025-09-26 · Natchez · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Margaret Fudickar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2025-08-09 · Natchez · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Suzan Hogue
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
L
Anna Dotson / Nancy Thompson
2025-08-07 · Natchez · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Suzan Hogue
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2025-07-31 · Natchez · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Suzan Hogue
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
W
2025-04-07 · Natchez · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sally Jones
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 2-6, 1-0
W
2025-04-03 · Natchez · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Margaret Fudickar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2025-03-27 · Natchez · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Suzan Hogue
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
L
2025-03-05 · Natchez · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Peggy Mayberry
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams14 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
66.7%
6W–3L · 54.9% of games
4.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.5
80%
4W–1L · 62.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 50% of the time
#2 Doubles
50%
8 matches
#1 Doubles
38%
6 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe