← Search

Carol Naslund

Oshkosh, WI
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
216 matches · 129W–87L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Carol Naslund to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history216 matches
L
2026-08-08 · #3 Doubles · with Debbie Beyer championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-31 · WI Adult 65&O 7.0W GML Mequon Elite Cicero · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Joan Donner
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W
Betsy Plummer / Jen Wahlers
2026-07-28 · WI Adult 18 & Over 4.0 Women NEL OgdenYMCA Romberg · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Debbie Beyer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
W
2026-07-17 · WI Adult 65&O 7.0W GML Mequon Elite Cicero · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Paula Shows
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-1
W
2026-06-19 · WI Adult 65&O 7.0W GML Mequon Elite Cicero · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Paula Shows
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 7-6
L
2026-06-16 · WI Adult 18 & Over 4.0 Women NEL OgdenYMCA Romberg · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amy Buege
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-05 · WI Adult 65&O 7.0W GML Mequon Elite Cicero · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Paula Shows
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
L
2026-05-29 · WI Adult 65&O 7.0W GML Mequon Elite Cicero · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Joan Donner
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-16 · WI Tri-Level Mid Women NEL Ogden Naslund · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rachel Sawall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-7
L
2026-05-09 · WI Tri-Level Mid Women NEL Ogden Naslund · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sue Roberts
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-02 · WI Tri-Level Mid Women NEL Ogden Naslund · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nicole Roberts
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams28 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
4.0
64%
55W–31L · 57.5% of games
4.5
42.9%
3W–4L · 49.2% of games
7.0
73.3%
11W–4L · 60.4% of games
7.5
59.4%
19W–13L · 54.1% of games
8.0
76.5%
26W–8L · 59.7% of games
8.5
60%
3W–2L · 53.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 39% of the time
#2 Doubles
39%
85 matches
#1 Doubles
38%
82 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
44 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams