← Search

Barbara Lefleur

— year-end
15 matches · 9W–6L · seasons 2019–2023

Captains: add Barbara Lefleur to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history15 matches
L
2023-08-17 · Hampshire: Vintage · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Marilyn Birdsall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
2023-08-15 · Hampshire: Vintage · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Maryjo Giunta
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2023-07-20 · Hampshire: Vintage · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Shari Mae Schwarz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2023-05-25 · Hampshire: Vintage · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Joan Druker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
Janet Robinson / Sandra Capifali
2022-08-15 · New Rochelle Racquet Club · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Shari Mae Schwarz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2022-08-11 · New Rochelle Racquet Club · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Shari Mae Schwarz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2020-02-10 · Match Point Slice Girls · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Becky Glaser
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-1, 1-0
L
2020-02-06 · Match Point Slice Girls · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Shari Mae Schwarz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
W
2020-01-08 · Match Point Slice Girls · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jamie Winkler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 2-6, 1-0
W
2019-07-02 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Elizabeth Simeone
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2019-06-25 · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Elizabeth Simeone
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
W
2019-06-12 · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Elizabeth Simeone
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
Teams4 teams · 2020–2023
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
75%
6W–2L · 61% of games
6.0
50%
3W–3L · 47.5% of games
7.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 60% of the time
#3 Doubles
60%
9 matches
#1 Doubles
13%
2 matches
#2 Doubles
13%
2 matches
#4 Doubles
13%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer