← Search

Kathy Zamer

— year-end
19 matches · 4W–15L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Kathy Zamer to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history19 matches
L
2026-03-20 · Huntcliff (Kathlyn Meyers)* · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Beverly Sauer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
Rebecca Myers / Victoria Davis Rappe
2026-03-06 · Huntcliff (Kathlyn Meyers)* · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Marilyn Reese
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-02-13 · Huntcliff (Kathlyn Meyers)* · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kathy Myers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
L
2026-02-06 · Huntcliff (Kathlyn Meyers)* · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Marilyn Reese
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2025-03-14 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Susan Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
W
Maxine Russack / Gwen Lemberg
2025-03-07 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Katherine Jenkins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2025-02-28 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Wendy Whelchel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
Victoria Davis Rappe / Rebecca Myers
2025-02-21 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Pat Rhyner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2025-02-10 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Margaret Krengel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2024-03-14 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Katherine Jenkins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
Vivian G Williams / Sharon Johnson
2024-02-29 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Katherine Jenkins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
L
2024-02-23 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Gayle Box
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
Teams1 team
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 levels played
3.0
21.1%
4W–15L · 34.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 42% of the time
#1 Doubles
42%
8 matches
#2 Doubles
37%
7 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer