← Search

Jeffrey Acker

Philadelphia, PA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
57 matches · 31W–26L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Jeffrey Acker to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history57 matches
W
2026-06-28 · Court Kings · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mauricio Saavedra
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 2-6, 1-0
L
Michael Marinus Young / Emma Pickering
2026-06-07 · #3 Doubles · with Courtney Darling championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-06-06 · #1 Doubles · with Sally Finley championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-05 · #2 Doubles · with Sally Finley championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
W
2026-05-31 · Court Kings · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kenn Waibel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-05-17 · Court Kings · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-05-03 · Court Kings · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-02-28 · NJD/Djokers · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Sally Finley mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-2
W
2025-06-29 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michael Larkin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
W
2025-06-22 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Steven Graflage
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
L
William Bacheler
2025-06-08 · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2025-05-18 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Roy Schonberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams6 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0
62.5%
15W–9L · 53.7% of games
4.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
50%
13W–13L · 49.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 35% of the time
#2 Doubles
35%
20 matches
#3 Doubles
32%
18 matches
#1 Singles
18%
10 matches
#1 Doubles
14%
8 matches
#2 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer