← Search

John Helmer III

Portland, OR
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
38 matches · 16W–22L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add John Helmer III to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history38 matches
W
2026-05-15 · NOR-MAC-Henderson · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with James Ringelberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
W
2026-05-12 · NOR-MAC-Henderson · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with James Ringelberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-07 · NOR-MAC-Henderson · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with John Hall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-04-30 · NOR-MAC-Henderson · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with John Williams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
W
2026-04-09 · NOR-MAC-Henderson · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Bill Henderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-04-03 · NOR-MAC-Henderson · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Bill Henderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-03-26 · NOR-MAC-Henderson · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with James Ringelberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L
2025-11-22 · MAC-Turnbull/McDonagh · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Patrick Herbst
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L
2025-10-31 · MAC-Turnbull/McDonagh · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Christopher Graham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2025-10-18 · MAC-Turnbull/McDonagh · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with James Ringelberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2025-10-04 · MAC-Turnbull/McDonagh · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with James Ringelberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
L
2025-09-27 · MAC-Turnbull/McDonagh · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Harry Semler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams47 teams · 2001–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.5
22.2%
2W–7L · 41% of games
8.0
55.6%
10W–8L · 51.3% of games
9.0
36.4%
4W–7L · 43.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 34% of the time
#2 Doubles
34%
13 matches
#3 Doubles
32%
12 matches
#1 Doubles
29%
11 matches
#1 Singles
5%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is mostly mental. You win or lose the match before you even go out there.
Venus Williams