← Search

Eduardo Vegas

Tucson, AZ
4.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
148 matches · 84W–64L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Eduardo Vegas to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history148 matches
L
2026-05-10 · TRC Lopez · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Nicole Gavin mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-04 · Kaboom! 18 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Patrick Simpson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
L
2026-03-21 · SAZ 40/4/5 M- Sam Ritchie · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Joshua Katz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-03-08 · TRC-55 · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Kevin Conway
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-02-15 · TRC-55 · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Patrick Simpson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-02-14 · SAZ 40/4/5 M- Sam Ritchie · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Shubhayu Chakraborty
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-01-31 · SAZ 40/4/5 M- Sam Ritchie · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kevin Conway
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-01-25 · TRC-55 · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Patrick Simpson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
L
2026-01-18 · TRC-55 · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Kevin Conway
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-01-17 · SAZ 40/4/5 M- Sam Ritchie · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Joshua Katz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2024-07-20 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Renee Lopez mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 3-6
L
2024-06-30 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kimber Ciruli mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams12 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
4.0
68.2%
30W–14L · 59.1% of games
4.5
48.7%
19W–20L · 51.7% of games
8.0
78.3%
18W–5L · 62.7% of games
9.0
38.1%
8W–13L · 48.6% of games
4.5mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
50%
9W–9L · 50.7% of games
9.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 39% of the time
#3 Doubles
39%
58 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
47 matches
#1 Doubles
28%
42 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert