← Search

Barry Christensen

North Richland Hills, TX
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
60 matches · 40W–20L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Barry Christensen to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history60 matches
W
2026-05-30 · RTC JOINER · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Andy Joiner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-05-18 · RTC JOINER · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Curt Hansen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-02 · RTC JOINER · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Curt Hansen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-04-12 · RTC PATTON · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with David Bock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 3-6, 0-1
L
Shiraz Rehman / David Wright
2026-04-11 · RTC JOINER · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bruce Patton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
W
2026-03-29 · RTC PATTON · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Paul Larmon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-5
L
2026-03-28 · RTC JOINER · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Curt Hansen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-03-11 · RTC PATTON · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with David Bock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-03-08 · RTC PATTON · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kalen Gunderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-02-28 · RTC JOINER · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Curt Hansen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
Brian Smith / Jeff Yale
2026-02-21 · RTC JOINER · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Curt Hansen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 0-1
W
2026-02-17 · RTC JOINER · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kalen Gunderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams48 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
66.7%
10W–5L · 64.4% of games
3.5
58.3%
14W–10L · 51.4% of games
6.0
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0
76.9%
10W–3L · 61.2% of games
7.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 50% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 43% of the time
#1 Doubles
43%
26 matches
#2 Doubles
42%
25 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
9 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer