← Search

David Schlosser

Lititz, PA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
121 matches · 79W–42L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add David Schlosser to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history121 matches
W
Charles Taylor / Frank Bova
2026-07-25 · CPD · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Don Hutchison
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5
W
2026-07-25 · CPD · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Don Hutchison
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2
W
2026-06-07 · RCW - Campbell · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Steve Staman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
L
2026-05-28 · RCW - Campbell · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Dave Henneman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-05-17 · RCW - Campbell · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Steve Staman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-02-15 · #1 Doubles · with James Werst championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L
2025-09-27 · #2 Doubles · with Dick Fleming championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2025-09-21 · #1 Doubles · with Steve Staman championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2025-08-10 · Manheim - Berkley · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with William Loercher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2025-08-10 · CPD - Stauffer · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Frederick JR Shaak
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
Gary McHugh / George Whittaker
2025-08-09 · CPD - Stauffer · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Don Hutchison
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2025-08-09 · CPD - Stauffer · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Don Hutchison
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams31 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
4.0
88.9%
8W–1L · 59.9% of games
7.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0
86.5%
32W–5L · 62.2% of games
9.0
20%
1W–4L · 38.9% of games
8.0mixed
50%
22W–22L · 50.9% of games
9.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 59.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 52% of the time
#1 Doubles
52%
63 matches
#2 Doubles
35%
42 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
16 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe