Kedar Bhat
Chicago, IL
247 matches · 119W–128L · seasons 2020–2027
Captains: add Kedar Bhat to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.
Match history247 matches
W
Luis Gonzalez / Patrick Ayala
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 5-6, 1-0
L
Joseph Reiter / Christopher Stewart
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-7, 0-1
W
Chad Anderson / Howard Gartzman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
W
N/A
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams68 teams · 2021–2027
CHI E 18M3.5 1.Tam Bhat Sun 11 $25
CHI E 18M4.0 2.Tam Bhat Sat 3 $25
CHI E 40M3.5 2.Tam Bhat Sat 5 $25
CHI E 40M4.0 1.Tam Bhat Sat 5 $25
CHI E M18.7.0 6.LSF Chang Sun 7 $26
NITA E 35M40c Huntley-Lawver/Cislak
CDTA E 18&OM3.5 4Tam Bhat Sun 11 $22
CDTA E 18&OM4.0 4Tam Bhat Sat 6 $22
CDTA E 40&OM3.5 2Tam Bhat Sat 3 $22
CDTA E 40&OM4.0 2Tam Bhat Sat 5 $22
CDTA E M18&O7.0 1Lake Chang Sun 7 $26
CDTA S 18&OM3.5 8.Tam Bhat Sat 3 $22
CDTA S 18&OM4.0 8.Tam Bhat Sat 3 $22
CDTA S 40&OM3.5 1.Tam Bhat Tue 7 $22
CDTA S 40&OM4.0 5.Tam Bhat Sun 3 $22
CDTA S ComboX7.5 8.McFet Baltazar Sun 3 $25
CDTA S M18&O7.0 4.Lake Chang Sun 7 $26
CDTA W 18&OM3.5 8.Tam Bhat Sun 11 $22
CDTA W 18&OM4.0 6.Tam Bhat Sat 3 $22
CDTA W 40&OM3.5 2.Tam Bhat Sat 5 $22
CDTA W 40&OM4.0 2.Tam Bhat Sat 5 $22
CDTA W ComboX7.5 7.McFet Baltazar Sat 6 $25
CDTA W M18&O7.0 1.Lake Chang Sun 7 $26
CDTA W M40&O7.0 6.Gnbk Tysl Sun 7 $30
NITA S 35M40b Huntley-Lawver/Cislak
NITA W 35M40b NMHFCH-Lawver
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.0
80%
4W–1L · 62.3% of games
3.5
45.8%
66W–78L · 49.9% of games
4.0
40%
2W–3L · 47.7% of games
7.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
10.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5mixed
60%
3W–2L · 56.8% of games
7.0mixed
52.9%
18W–16L · 50.8% of games
7.5mixed
43.3%
13W–17L · 47.4% of games
8.0mixed
58.3%
7W–5L · 56.6% of games
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #2 Doubles, 43% of the time
#2 Doubles
43%
107 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
66 matches
#1 Doubles
24%
59 matches
#2 Singles
5%
12 matches
#1 Singles
0%
1 match
#3 Singles
0%
1 match
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
Tennis is a perfect combination of violent action taking place in an atmosphere of total tranquillity.