← Search

Brad van Winkle

Austin, TX
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
33 matches · 16W–17L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Brad van Winkle to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history33 matches
L
2026-06-20 · Westover Seniors · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Tom Skowronek
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-13 · Westover Seniors · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Tom Skowronek
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
Bob Harris / Christopher Swenson
2026-05-16 · Westover Seniors · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Tom Skowronek
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
Bob Harris / Christopher Swenson
2026-04-25 · Westover Seniors · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Tom Skowronek
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
W
2026-04-11 · Racfitters · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Michael Lane
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-04-04 · Racfitters · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Michael Lane
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
L
2025-06-14 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jeff Fifield
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
L
2025-06-07 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Guy MacNeill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-7
W
2025-05-31 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Guy MacNeill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2025-05-10 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jeff Fifield
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 1-6, 1-0
L
2025-04-26 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jeff Fifield
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
L
2025-04-12 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with John Lachance
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams5 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.5
42.9%
3W–4L · 50.4% of games
8.0
60%
9W–6L · 49.8% of games
9.0
36.4%
4W–7L · 40.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 52% of the time
#1 Doubles
52%
17 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
10 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is mostly mental. You win or lose the match before you even go out there.
Venus Williams