← Search

Jane Tucker

Commerce Township, MI
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
117 matches · 33W–84L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jane Tucker to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history117 matches
L
Elizabeth Koller / Jacquelyn Parks
2026-08-07 · PEACH-Swiderski 65S 7.0 DW · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Deborah Sanders
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-09 · HV-Belcher 18s 3.0 NW F6 · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
L
2026-07-07 · HV-Belcher 40s 3.0 NW F3 · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-02 · HV-Belcher 18s 3.0 NW F6 · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-06-26 · PEACH-Swiderski 65S 7.0 DW · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Deborah Sanders
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-2
L
2026-06-25 · HV-Belcher 18s 3.0 NW F6 · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
L
2026-06-18 · HV-Belcher 18s 3.0 NW F6 · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-16 · HV-Belcher 40s 3.0 NW F3 · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-11 · HV-Belcher 18s 3.0 NW F6 · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-04 · HV-Belcher 18s 3.0 NW F6 · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-05-28 · HV-Belcher 18s 3.0 NW F6 · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-21 · HV-Belcher 18s 3.0 NW F6 · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams22 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
27.1%
13W–35L · 39.8% of games
3.5
20%
8W–32L · 34.7% of games
7.0
37.5%
9W–15L · 43.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 27% of the time
#1 Singles
27%
31 matches
#1 Doubles
20%
23 matches
#2 Singles
18%
21 matches
#2 Doubles
14%
16 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
16 matches
#3 Singles
8%
9 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Pressure is a privilege.
Billie Jean King