← Search

Adam Poe

Denver, CO
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
44 matches · 12W–32L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Adam Poe to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history44 matches
W
Mark Anderson / Pete Gillespie
2026-07-14 · CM RED · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with David Gordon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
L
2026-07-07 · CM RED · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Matthew Parsons
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-30 · CM RED · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lee Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-23 · CM RED · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Chris Giblin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-16 · CM RED · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lee Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-02 · CM RED · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Chris Giblin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
2025-06-03 · CM RED · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mark Melberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2025-05-27 · CM NAVY · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jim Roper
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L
2025-05-20 · CM NAVY · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with David Tighe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2025-05-19 · CM NAVY · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with David Tighe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
Bryan Nuber / David Nelson
2025-05-13 · CM NAVY · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with David Tighe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2025-04-29 · CM NAVY · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with David Tighe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams9 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
14.3%
2W–12L · 35.6% of games
4.0
41.7%
5W–7L · 49.4% of games
8.0
33.3%
5W–10L · 43.2% of games
8.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 41% of the time
#2 Doubles
41%
18 matches
#1 Doubles
39%
17 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
9 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer