← Search

Jeffrey Wilcoxon

New Albany, OH
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
65 matches · 32W–33L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jeffrey Wilcoxon to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history65 matches
L
2026-05-17 · New Albany · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Carl Quinion
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-05-17 · New Albany · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-05-03 · New Albany · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-04-19 · New Albany · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Brian Hall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-04-19 · New Albany · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michael Kreitzer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
W
2026-04-18 · New Albany · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Alex Eberlyn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-04-12 · New Albany · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Carl Quinion
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
David Foster / Michael Thomas
2026-03-22 · New Albany · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Aaron Gilbert
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-03-21 · Elysium · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Milan Jovanovic
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
W
Roger Speck / Alexander Thompson
2026-03-15 · New Albany · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Evan Mitelman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-03-01 · New Albany · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
Christopher Esber / Joseph Holland
2026-02-15 · New Albany · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Alex Eberlyn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams19 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
93.3%
14W–1L · 65.9% of games
4.5
33.3%
14W–28L · 43.1% of games
8.5
33.3%
2W–4L · 42.5% of games
8.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 35% of the time
#3 Doubles
35%
23 matches
#1 Doubles
34%
22 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
17 matches
#1 Singles
3%
2 matches
#2 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is a perfect combination of violent action taking place in an atmosphere of total tranquillity.
Billie Jean King