← Search

Bill Merriam

Jacksonville, FL
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
184 matches · 91W–93L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Bill Merriam to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history184 matches
W
2026-08-13 · Jax Golf - Hursey · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Dianna Menefee mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-06-26 · Jax Golf - Merriam · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Allison Carbonneau mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-03-29 · Jax Golf CC - Schwartz · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Bill Mazar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-03-22 · Jax Golf CC - Schwartz · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with John Crowley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
L
2026-03-22 · Jax Golf CC - Hursey · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Johnny Witt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2025-12-13 · #3 Doubles · with Sally Lynch championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
L
2025-12-13 · #3 Doubles · with Patricia Engel championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2025-09-02 · JaxGolf Hursey · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Patricia Engel mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
2025-08-26 · JaxGolf Hursey · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sally Lynch mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L
Pam Fritz / Tim Fritz
2025-08-07 · JaxGolf Hursey · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sally Lynch mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
Tim Fritz / Pam Fritz
2025-07-17 · JaxGolf Hursey · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Patricia Engel mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2025-06-29 · Jax Golf/Queens - Torruella · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Moody McCall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams42 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
0.0
25%
1W–3L · 38.5% of games
4.0
51.9%
42W–39L · 50.8% of games
7.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.5
50%
2W–2L · 58.1% of games
8.0
45.5%
10W–12L · 47% of games
8.5
80%
4W–1L · 64.2% of games
7.0mixed
48.9%
22W–23L · 50% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 25% of the time
#2 Doubles
25%
46 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
44 matches
#1 Singles
21%
39 matches
#1 Doubles
14%
26 matches
#2 Singles
13%
23 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer