← Search

Edward la Cava

Woodinville, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
83 matches · 43W–40L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Edward la Cava to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history83 matches
W
2026-06-18 · #1 Doubles · with Alan Mitchel championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-06-16 · #1 Doubles · with Alan Mitchel championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
W
2026-06-03 · NWW-MI-Sims · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with William Chapman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
W
2026-05-25 · NWW-MI-Sims · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Alan Mitchel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-05-13 · NWW-MI-Sims · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Alan Mitchel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
W
2026-05-06 · NWW-MI-Sims · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Alan Mitchel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-04-30 · NWW-MI-Sims · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Alan Mitchel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-04-20 · NWW-MI-Sims · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Alan Mitchel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-04-15 · NWW-MI-Sims · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Alan Mitchel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
L
2025-11-16 · CP-Gents-Paulson · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Patrick McGowan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-7, 0-1
W
2025-10-10 · CP-Gents-Paulson · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Tod Wescott
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2025-09-28 · CP-Gents-Paulson · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Shu Chen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams14 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
4.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
7.0
78.9%
15W–4L · 61.9% of games
8.0
44.4%
12W–15L · 50.6% of games
9.0
27.3%
3W–8L · 45.9% of games
8.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
9.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 40% of the time
#3 Doubles
40%
33 matches
#1 Doubles
35%
29 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
21 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal