← Search

Ted James

— year-end
27 matches · 19W–8L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Ted James to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history27 matches
L
Kenneth Osborne / Kevin Petersen
2026-06-28 · TJames (CSRC) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Allan Reich
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
Sam Eyerman / William King
2026-05-31 · TJames (CSRC) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Allan Reich
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-04-21 · TJames (CSRC) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brian Scaffidi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-03-31 · TJames (CSRC) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michael Ziemer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
Kyle Johnson / Sunil Mehta
2026-03-17 · TJames (CSRC) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Trey Walters
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-03-10 · TJames (CSRC) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michael Ziemer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
Mike Thompson / Matthew Hembree
2025-07-26 · TJames (CSRC) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Allan Reich
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2025-04-29 · TJames (CSRC) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michael Boyce
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2025-04-08 · TJames (CSRC) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Robert Wallace
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2025-04-01 · TJames (CSRC) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sam Moran
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2025-03-19 · TJames (CSRC) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Trey Walters
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
W
2025-03-04 · TJames (CSRC) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chris Elkins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-1, 1-0
Teams11 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
87.5%
7W–1L · 60.9% of games
4.0
69.2%
9W–4L · 55.6% of games
6.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 56% of the time
#1 Doubles
56%
15 matches
#2 Doubles
44%
12 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe