Ken Sitar
194 matches · 116W–78L · seasons 2019–2026
Captains: add Ken Sitar to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.
Match history194 matches
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
Teams66 teams · 2021–2027
CHI E 40M4.5 1.Tam Needler Sat 5 $25
CHI E M18.8.0 3.CPE Sitar Fri 7:30 $28
Hold Registrations #1
CDTA E M18&O8.0 3CPE Sitar Fri 7:30 $28
CDTA E M18&O9.0 1Cent Nakamura Sun 1 $20
CDTA S M18&O8.0 2.CPE Sitar Fri 7 $28
CDTA S M18&O9.0 2.Wilm Wright Sun 11 $22
CDTA S M40&O9.0 1.RT Stenmark Sun 10 $27
CDTA W 18&OM4.5 7.CPE Sitar Sat 4 $28
CDTA W ComboX8.5 1.Tam Wright Sat 5 $22
CDTA W M18&O8.0 6.CPE Sitar Fri 7:30 $28
CDTA W M18&O9.0 4.Wlmt Nakamura Sun 11 $20
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0
72.2%
13W–5L · 58.7% of games
4.5
21.4%
3W–11L · 42.9% of games
8.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
93.3%
14W–1L · 67.7% of games
8.0mixed
69%
49W–22L · 58.1% of games
8.5mixed
50%
9W–9L · 54.3% of games
9.0mixed
45.2%
19W–23L · 47.5% of games
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #1 Doubles, 42% of the time
#1 Doubles
42%
81 matches
#2 Doubles
34%
65 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
45 matches
#2 Singles
1%
2 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.