← Search

Marie Hartley

— year-end
15 matches · 1W–14L · seasons 2024–2027

Captains: add Marie Hartley to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history15 matches
L
2026-07-12 · Cedar Creek (Faye McCorkle)* · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Bonnie Ferguson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-21 · Cedar Creek (Faye McCorkle)* · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Bonnie Ferguson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2025-02-26 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Theresa ODonnell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 3-6, 2-6
L
2025-01-15 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Phyllis Grimes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2024-11-09 · Cedar Creek (Faye McCorkle)* · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tomeka Blackmon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2024-10-30 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Phyllis Grimes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2024-10-23 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Phyllis Grimes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 5-7
L
2024-10-16 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Phyllis Grimes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2023-07-25 · Hudlow (Beverly Blissit)* · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Corinne Dunn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2023-07-02 · Cedar Creek (Faye McCorkle)* · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cherrie Broome
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 2-6
L
2023-06-27 · Hudlow (Beverly Blissit)* · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tina Cahoon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2023-06-25 · Cedar Creek (Faye McCorkle)* · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Allison Ellison
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-5
Teams5 teams · 2023–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.5
0%
0W–5L · 35.4% of games
4.0
10%
1W–9L · 33.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
6 matches
#3 Doubles
33%
5 matches
#2 Doubles
20%
3 matches
#4 Doubles
7%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe