← Search

Greg Wandrick

Alpharetta, GA
3.0A year-end 2025
i
Appeal — granted on request, not computed
68 matches · 34W–34L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Greg Wandrick to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history68 matches
L
2026-08-22 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bob Hadley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-18 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael Elder
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
Tucker Braddy / Andrew Szymke
2026-06-28 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Steven Thomas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
W
2026-06-21 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Panome Thepmanivong
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 4-6, 6-1
L
2026-03-13 · Oxford Mill (Steven Thomas)* · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Greg Zagorski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
W
2026-03-06 · Oxford Mill (Steven Thomas)* · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Warner Boyd
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
W
2026-03-02 · Oxford Mill (Steven Thomas)* · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Warner Boyd
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-02-28 · Oxford Mill (Steven Thomas)* · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with George Darden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
W
2026-02-21 · Oxford Mill (Steven Thomas)* · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joel Schoenblum
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 4-6, 7-6
L
2026-02-14 · Oxford Mill (Steven Thomas)* · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Greg Zagorski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-02-06 · Oxford Mill (Steven Thomas)* · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kenneth Boughrum
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-01-21 · Oxford Mill (Steven Thomas)* · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with James Woods
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams10 teams · 2026–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 levels played
3.5
50%
34W–34L · 49.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 44% of the time
#3 Doubles
44%
30 matches
#1 Doubles
28%
19 matches
#2 Doubles
18%
12 matches
#4 Doubles
7%
5 matches
#1 Singles
3%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer