← Search

Elaine Zuckerman

Park City, UT
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
73 matches · 17W–56L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Elaine Zuckerman to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history73 matches
W
2026-09-08 · Mountain Mavens · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Betsy Wright
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-09-01 · Mountain Mavens · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Samantha Levin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-06 · Park City Racquet Pack · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Rebecca Rush
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-18 · Mountain Mavens · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andrea Rosenberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-15 · Park City Racquet Pack · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Elizabeth Carrington
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-06-01 · Park City Racquet Pack · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sue Ann Kern
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-21 · Park City MARC-Deb's Warriors · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andrea Rosenberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
L
2026-05-01 · Park City MARC-Deb's Warriors · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Heather Bratcher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
L
2026-04-30 · Park City MARC-Deb's Warriors · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Megan Alexander
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2025-10-09 · Park City MARC-Smith/Thomas · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Heather Bratcher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
L
2025-10-02 · Park City MARC-Smith/Thomas · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Heather Bratcher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-7
W
2025-09-20 · Day Dream Believers · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mae Alexander
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams29 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0
20.3%
12W–47L · 40.4% of games
7.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0
33.3%
3W–6L · 44.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
26 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
22 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
18 matches
#2 Female Doubles
3%
2 matches
#3 Female Doubles
3%
2 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert