← Search

Sandra Nakayama

— year-end
30 matches · 13W–17L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Sandra Nakayama to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history30 matches
L
2026-09-12 · KY/LOU/HENDRICH · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Karen Voorhees
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-1, 0-1
L
2026-08-16 · KY/LOU/HENDRICH · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Karen Voorhees
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-08 · KY/LOU/HENDRICH · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Gail Stein
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
L
2026-08-02 · KY/LOU/HENDRICH · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Karen Voorhees
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
L
2026-03-28 · KY/LOU/POLLOCK · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jan Weimer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
L
2026-03-22 · KY/LOU/POLLOCK · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jan Weimer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-03-18 · KY/LOU/POLLOCK · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christine Przeworski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-03-14 · KY/LOU/POLLOCK · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jan Weimer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-03-08 · KY/LOU/POLLOCK · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jan Weimer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2025-05-10 · KY/LOU/POLLOCK/MCGREGOR · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tammy Pollock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2025-04-27 · KY/LOU/POLLOCK/MCGREGOR · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Akemi Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
L
2025-03-21 · KY/LOU/POLLOCK/MCGREGOR · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Micah Harter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
Teams14 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
4.0
58.8%
10W–7L · 49.7% of games
7.5
23.1%
3W–10L · 47.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 40% of the time
#2 Doubles
40%
12 matches
#1 Doubles
33%
10 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams