← Search

Janet Lane

Morrison, CO
2.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
54 matches · 13W–41L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Janet Lane to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history54 matches
W
2026-08-06 · BM PINK · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Susan Hickel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-07-30 · BM PINK · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Miki Lorentz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-02 · BM PINK · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jane Miley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-11 · BM RED · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jane Miley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-04 · BM RED · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Nathalia Faribault
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
L
2026-05-14 · BM RED · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Miki Lorentz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-07 · BM RED · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Deborah Lawson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2025-08-07 · BM YELLOW · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Suzanne Hattery
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2025-07-10 · BM YELLOW · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Miki Lorentz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2025-07-03 · BM YELLOW · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Mary Hobson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2025-06-05 · BM RED · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Deb Lawson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2025-05-22 · BM RED · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Deb Lawson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams13 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
6.0
30%
9W–21L · 43.8% of games
7.0
16.7%
4W–20L · 36.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 37% of the time
#2 Doubles
37%
20 matches
#3 Doubles
35%
19 matches
#1 Doubles
28%
15 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer