← Search

Vibsen Lay

— year-end
45 matches · 21W–24L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Vibsen Lay to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history45 matches
W
2026-04-30 · OK/Smith/Tulsa · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Connie Mill championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-04-30 · OK/Smith/Tulsa · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Deborah Lee championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-04-29 · OK/Smith/Tulsa · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michele Smith championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-29 · OK/Smith/Tulsa · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Connie Mill championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-1, 0-1
L
2024-10-05 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Barbara Evans
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
L
2024-10-05 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Barbara Evans
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
L
2024-10-04 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Barbara Evans
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2024-06-01 · Burch/LF 55&over · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Janet Rader
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
W
2024-04-27 · Burch/LF 55&over · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Janet Rader
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2024-04-20 · Burch/LF 55&over · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Janet Rader
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2024-03-30 · Burch/LF 55&over · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Janet Rader
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2024-03-02 · Burch/LF 55&over · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Barbara Evans
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
Teams13 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
26.7%
4W–11L · 42.3% of games
3.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0
66.7%
16W–8L · 54% of games
7.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 47% of the time
#1 Doubles
47%
21 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
14 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
10 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer