← Search

Elizabeth Todd

Indianapolis, IN
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
96 matches · 24W–72L · seasons 2019–2025

Captains: add Elizabeth Todd to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history96 matches
W
2025-07-10 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Pamela Bennett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
Sarah Gibbs / Emily Hostetter
2025-06-19 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Katherine Butler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-4, 1-0
L
Emily Gray / Jennifer Stump
2025-06-12 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Katherine Butler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L
2025-05-29 · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Pamela Bennett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2025-05-15 · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sandi Frizzell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
Natalie Scheidler / Jennifer White
2024-10-24 · CIN A40 3.0W WIRC Bourquin · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jo Fowler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
L
2024-07-11 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jo Fowler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-0, 0-1
L
Stacey Heidt / Julie Schlueter
2024-06-27 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Peggy Linard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
2024-06-20 · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Peggy Linard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
Chris S / Kerry Moore
2024-06-06 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Peggy Linard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
Karen Roberts / Kyle Fisher
2024-05-23 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jo Fowler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2024-04-10 · CIN Indianapolis, Combo 5.5 W, Bourquin (IHP) · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Gayle Jones
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 5-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams3 teams · 2024–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
28.2%
20W–51L · 38.9% of games
3.5
16.7%
3W–15L · 24.7% of games
5.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0
20%
1W–4L · 36% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 44% of the time
#2 Doubles
44%
42 matches
#1 Doubles
31%
30 matches
#3 Doubles
12%
11 matches
#1 Singles
6%
6 matches
#4 Doubles
6%
6 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal