← Search

Mary Jo Kallgren

— year-end
32 matches · 18W–14L · seasons 2019–2023

Captains: add Mary Jo Kallgren to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history32 matches
W
2022-10-16 · MAC-Orban/Kallgren · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Stacy Hawkins Parker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
Jo Ann Kurz / Pamela Alexander
2022-06-25 · #1 Doubles · with Elise Orban championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2022-06-25 · #1 Doubles · with Trina Denson championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L
2022-06-24 · #1 Doubles · with Stacy Hawkins Parker championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L
2022-06-19 · Campbell/Duong · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Shannon Dilorenzo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
L
2022-03-06 · MAC-Johnson/Leahy · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Greg Masson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2022-02-20 · MAC-Duong/Campbell · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Amy Leahy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2022-02-06 · MAC-Johnson/Leahy · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Jay Wilson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
L
2022-01-29 · MAC-Johnson/Leahy · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Andrew Nilsson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W
2022-01-16 · MAC-Duong/Campbell · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Stephanie Leeding
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L
2021-11-21 · MAC-Leahy/Layne · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Stacy Hawkins Parker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2021-11-06 · MAC-Leahy/Layne · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Elise Orban
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-5
Teams6 teams · 2022–2023
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.5
71.4%
5W–2L · 52% of games
9.0
60%
3W–2L · 52.9% of games
10.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 41.7% of games
9.0mixed
53.8%
7W–6L · 55% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 41% of the time
#1 Doubles
41%
13 matches
#3 Doubles
34%
11 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert