← Search

Joel Ackerman

Leawood, KS
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
64 matches · 46W–18L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Joel Ackerman to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history64 matches
L
2026-07-19 · #2 Doubles · with John Henderson championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-18 · #1 Doubles · with John Henderson championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
L
2026-05-26 · Mekles, Todd · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kevin Wu
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-05-20 · Mekles, Todd · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with John Henderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
W
2026-05-12 · Mekles, Todd · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with John Henderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
W
2026-04-28 · Mekles, Todd · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with John Henderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-04-21 · Mekles, Todd · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Bradley Martin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-04-14 · Mekles, Todd · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Juan Carlos Correa
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-7
W
2025-11-22 · Mekles, Todd · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kevin Wu
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2025-10-04 · Mekles, Todd · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Austin Collazo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 1-6, 0-1
W
2025-09-27 · Mekles, Todd · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Juan Carlos Correa
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L
2025-06-28 · #3 Doubles · with Joshua Douglass championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams21 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.5
76.4%
42W–13L · 58.7% of games
5.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 60.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 28% of the time
#2 Doubles
28%
18 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
17 matches
#1 Doubles
25%
16 matches
#1 Singles
16%
10 matches
#2 Singles
5%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal