← Search

Denise Agnew

Lutz, FL
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
139 matches · 102W–37L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Denise Agnew to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history139 matches
W
2026-07-12 · #4 Doubles · with Avery Zercoe championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-11 · #4 Doubles · with Avery Zercoe championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-07-11 · #1 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 5-7
W
2026-06-06 · HILLS/40&Over4.5W/Zercoe · #4 Doubles · 4.5 · with Stephanie Wager
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-05-27 · HILLS/40&Over4.5W/Zercoe · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Maki Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
L
2026-04-25 · HILLS/40&Over4.5W/Zercoe · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
L
2026-02-21 · HCC Aces of Grace - E. Baldwin · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Kim Cashman-King
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-02-07 · HCC Aces of Grace - E. Baldwin · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Kim Cashman-King
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-02-01 · HCC Aces of Grace - E. Baldwin · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Kim Cashman-King
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2025-07-28 · #2 Doubles · with Avery Zercoe championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
W
2025-07-27 · #4 Doubles · with Avery Zercoe championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
Ruthly Lesane / Debra Fieni
2025-07-27 · #4 Doubles · with Avery Zercoe championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams34 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.5
83.3%
30W–6L · 62.8% of games
8.0
75%
6W–2L · 66.9% of games
8.5
37.5%
3W–5L · 48.6% of games
9.0
63.2%
12W–7L · 58.9% of games
9.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 35% of the time
#1 Doubles
35%
48 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
41 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
39 matches
#4 Doubles
5%
7 matches
#1 Singles
2%
3 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert