← Search

Matthew Roemer

— year-end
68 matches · 34W–34L · seasons 2025–2027

Captains: add Matthew Roemer to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history68 matches
W
2026-09-13 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kevin McNew
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-06-27 · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-06-21 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kevin McNew
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-06-20 · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-06-14 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kevin McNew
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-06-13 · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-06-07 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Daniel Wolf
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-03 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Phil Forret
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-05-16 · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-05-14 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Daniel Wolf
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-05-09 · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
L
2026-05-03 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with David Murashige
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
Teams17 teams · 2024–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
66.7%
4W–2L · 60.6% of games
3.5
69%
20W–9L · 55% of games
4.0
30.3%
10W–23L · 41.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 32% of the time
#3 Doubles
32%
22 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
18 matches
#1 Singles
22%
15 matches
#1 Doubles
16%
11 matches
#2 Singles
3%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova