← Search

Barbara Criner

Saint Louis, MO
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
172 matches · 78W–94L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Barbara Criner to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history172 matches
W
2026-09-13 · Albrecht-Austin (F) · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Norma Prifti
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
W
2026-03-07 · Albrecht/Austin (S) · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Norma Prifti
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-03-02 · Albrecht · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Pam Manuel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-03-01 · Albrecht/Austin (S) · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Norma Prifti
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 5-4, 1-0
L
2026-02-16 · Albrecht · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Norma Prifti
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-02-08 · Burke/Wenneman (S) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Pam Henze
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
Taylor Jackson / Grace Tevaseu
2026-01-11 · Albrecht/Austin (F) · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Norma Prifti
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2025-11-23 · Albrecht/Austin (F) · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Janis Willmann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-0
L
2025-10-26 · Albrecht/Austin (F) · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Norma Prifti
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-5
L
2025-10-19 · Burke/Todd (F) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Pam Henze
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2025-10-12 · Burke/Todd (F) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Pam Henze
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 1-6, 1-0
W
2025-10-05 · Albrecht/Austin (F) · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Norma Prifti
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams46 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
69.8%
30W–13L · 53.9% of games
3.5
35.1%
33W–61L · 42.1% of games
6.0
87.5%
7W–1L · 72.2% of games
7.0
29.6%
8W–19L · 36.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 44% of the time
#3 Doubles
44%
75 matches
#2 Doubles
36%
61 matches
#1 Doubles
21%
36 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe