← Search

Rachel Lerner

— year-end
24 matches · 12W–12L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Rachel Lerner to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history24 matches
W
2026-07-06 · ACT:Acton:Nickerson:Cannuscio · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-06-08 · ACT:Acton:Nickerson:Cannuscio · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-18 · ACT:Acton:Nickerson:Cannuscio · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-5
W
2026-05-11 · ACT:Acton:Nickerson:Cannuscio · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2025-06-18 · WESF:Westfit:Howard/Durkin · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Meredith Lilley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2025-05-28 · WESF:Westfit:Howard/Durkin · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michelle Dawson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-4, 0-1
L
2024-07-10 · LTC:Lexington TC:Lilley/Lerner · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-5, 1-0
L
2023-06-21 · LTC:Lexington TC:Lilley · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
2023-06-07 · LTC:Lexington TC:Lilley · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L
2023-05-10 · LTC:Lexington TC:Lilley · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L
2022-07-13 · LTC:Lexington TC:Lilley/Lerner · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-4, 1-0
W
2022-07-06 · LTC:Lexington TC:Lilley/Lerner · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
Teams8 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 levels played
4.0
50%
12W–12L · 52.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 63% of the time
#1 Singles
63%
15 matches
#1 Doubles
25%
6 matches
#3 Doubles
8%
2 matches
#2 Singles
4%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams